Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-05T04:53:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > > default: both contents and metadata > > --data-only: same > > --schema-only: neither > > However, it means only large object performs an exceptional object class > that dumps its owner, acl and comment even if --data-only is given. > Is it really what you suggested, isn't it? I wonder we still need to have both "BLOB ITEM" and "BLOB DATA" even if we will take the all-or-nothing behavior. Can we handle BLOB's owner, acl, comment and data with one entry kind? Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center