Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-05T04:53:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:

> > 	default:	both contents and metadata
> > 	--data-only:	same
> > 	--schema-only:	neither
> 
> However, it means only large object performs an exceptional object class
> that dumps its owner, acl and comment even if --data-only is given.
> Is it really what you suggested, isn't it?

I wonder we still need to have both "BLOB ITEM" and "BLOB DATA"
even if we will take the all-or-nothing behavior. Can we handle
BLOB's owner, acl, comment and data with one entry kind?

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center