Re: Pathological regexp match

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:

> > (There's a badly needed CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in this code BTW)
>
> Incidentally, I ran across the exact same issue with a non-greedy
> regexp with a client earlier this week, and put on my TODO to figure
> out a good place to stick a check for interrupts. Does this mean I
> don't have to, because you're on it? ;)

No, sorry :-(

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.