Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, jd@commandprompt.com, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-22T17:08:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 22/09/10 20:00, Robert Haas wrote: > > But it CAN'T be a system catalog, because, among other problems, that > > rules out cascading slaves, which are a feature a lot of people > > probably want to eventually have. > > FWIW it could be a system catalog backed by a flat file. But I'm not in > favor of that for the other reasons I stated earlier. I thought we just eliminated flat file backing store for tables to improve replication behavior --- I don't see returning to that as a win. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +