Re: Configuring synchronous replication

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, jd@commandprompt.com, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-22T17:08:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 22/09/10 20:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> > But it CAN'T be a system catalog, because, among other problems, that
> > rules out cascading slaves, which are a feature a lot of people
> > probably want to eventually have.
> 
> FWIW it could be a system catalog backed by a flat file. But I'm not in 
> favor of that for the other reasons I stated earlier.

I thought we just eliminated flat file backing store for tables to
improve replication behavior --- I don't see returning to that as a win.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +