Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-24T19:07:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- /pgpatches/increment (text/x-diff) patch
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: > > All, > > > > I've been looking at the open item which belongs with this doc: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/backup-incremental-updated.html > > > > ... and my viewpoint is that the procedure described should be *cut* > > from the official docs and put on the Wiki, with warnings. It's simply > > far too hackish and dependant on DBA understanding of PostgreSQL > > internals to belong in the main docs. > > > > In 9.1 we'll probably have some machinery to make taking snapshots of > > the standby more reliable (like running pg_start_backup on the master), > > and then that procedure will belong in the main docs. > > FYI, I am working on a doc update that will use pg_start/stop backup on > the master, as suggested by Fujii Masao: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-08/msg00237.php I have created a doc patch (attached) to document a clean way to take a backup of the standby. This can be used for pitr, and to create additional slaves, so I do think this will be used more during 9.0. You can see the output here: http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/backup-incremental-updated.html The actual list of steps only appeared in 9.0 so I suggest this only be applied to HEAD and 9.0.X. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +