Re: Todays git migration results

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-17T17:24:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 18:48, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> OK, try this. ?It takes about 14 seconds on my machine on my copy of
> >> Magnus's test repository. ?Output looks like this:
> >
> > 14 seconds! ?That sound much too slow :-)
> 
> /me is very sorry master.  Please beat your unworthy servant only
> lightly...  or alternatively, buy me a faster machine.
> 
> It should get a bit faster if we reduce the number of branches it
> examines, which I assume is something we can do once we desupport 7.4
> and 8.0.  We could also add a --since argument which would doubtless
> speed things up a lot, by truncating the history to, say, the last N

Yes, I will definately need a --since argument like cvs log -d which
restricts by date.  I usually find the data of the previous release and
use that to pull cvs logs to create the release notes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +