Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-08-11T12:38:34Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Nothing.  The only reason to use those forms is in a join against
> >> pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
> >
> > ISTM this bug should be on the open items list...
> 
> I don't think this is a bug.

Agreed, and it's certainly not something that needs to be dealt with for
9.0..

	Thanks,

		Stephen