Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>, Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-07-16T16:04:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 16, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > > > Joy! :) Nice patch Robert. > > Indeed. > > What are the implications for pg_upgrade? Will a database with values > created before the patch continue to work after the patch has been > applied (as happened with the new hstore in 9.0), or will pg_upgrade > need to be taught how to upgrade the old storage format? Robert told me the old format continues to work in the upgraded databases. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +