Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> You could argue it either way.  The number of beta testers with
> >>> plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
> >>> just changing the code without a catversion bump.  OTOH, if we want to
> >>> encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
> >> 
> >> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.
> 
> > And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3.  :-)  Most fixes were related
> > to platform compile portability.
> 
> Well, if you think that pg_upgrade has changed materially since beta2,
> that would be a good argument for getting some fresh testing for it,
> which in turn argues for doing the catversion bump here.

Attached are the changes since beta2;  they are pretty minor.  The good
news is I think all reporters eventually got it working.  I assume using
it for beta3 would allow it work even better, and once you have use it
once, using it again is simple.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + None of us is going to be here forever. +