Re: warning message in standby
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-14T14:37:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> The correct log level for this message is LOG. End of discussion. > > > Why? > > Because it's not being issued in a user's session. The only place it > can go is to the system log, and if you use a level of WARNING or less, > it's likely to get filtered out by log_min_messages. > > I'm totally unimpressed by the argument that log-filtering applications > don't know enough to pay attention to LOG messages. There are already a > lot of those that are quite important to notice. My point was that log filtering applications might ignore WARNING. They don't usually ignore LOG. 8 -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +