Re: pg_upgrade output directory
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-12T03:58:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Why does pg_upgrade create its output directory in the user's home > directory (or TMP on Windows)? I should have thought that the current > working directory would be a more suitable choice. At the very least > there should be an option for where to create it. Also, this location > doesn't seem to be referred to at all in the docs. Yeah, it is odd. I did it that way because the output files need to exist after the utility is run, and I worried that putting them in the current directory might cause them to be accidentally deleted or overlooked. However, I might have been too conservative. How do tools that generate multiple output files usually handle this situation? Do they output in to a subdirectory in $HOME, or in a subdirectory of the current directory, or just create multiple files without a subdirectory? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +