Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-06-09T01:45:20Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

archive_cleanup_command.patch (application/octet-stream) patch

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
> >
> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
> 
> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that.  Who wants to do it?

Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
and recoveryEndCommand.


Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center