Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-03T19:35:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue jun 03 08:36:28 -0400 2010: > > > Using this only temporarily is mentioned in the doc patch. Do I need > > more? > > Yeah, it's far too easy to miss. Besides, I think the wording you used > is ambiguous -- it can be read as "the server will temporarily keep all > segments if you set it to -1", which is not the same thing at all. If > you can't add a 20-point-font red blinking warning with a pink dancing > elephant in a tutu, maybe it's best to not offer the dangerous setting > in the first place. Well, it seems enough people don't want this features that I am not going to add it. If we decide we want it later, we can add it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +