Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-06-03T01:47:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote: > > * inet datatypes don't have a commutative operator on which a unique > > index can be built. There is no "overlaps" equivalent, which again is a > > shame because that stops them being used with the new feature. > > This would be a nice thing to fix, and I was thinking about doing it, > but I just ran out of time. I think it can be left for 9.1. I have > not infrequently wanted to build an IP allocation database, and this > would be perfect for that. Added to TODO: Add INET overlaps operator, for use by exclusion constraints * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-03/msg00845.php -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +