Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-06-03T01:34:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:04:16PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
> > > index 9881ff4..9313112 100644
> > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
> > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
> > > @@ -7134,7 +7134,7 @@ CREATE TYPE rainbow AS ENUM ('red', 'orange', 'yellow', 'green', 'blue', 'purple
> > > </row>
> > > <row>
> > > <entry> <literal>&&</literal> </entry>
> > > - <entry>Overlaps?</entry>
> > > + <entry>Overlaps? One point in common makes this true.</entry>
> > > <entry><literal>box '((0,0),(1,1))' && box '((0,0),(2,2))'</literal></entry>
> > > </row>
> > > <row>
> >
> > Hmm, how does this look in horizontal space? (The <row> makes me think
> > it's a table.)
>
> Looks OK to me. The entry above, "Closest point to first operand on
> second operand" is actually wider.
Patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +