Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Ugh.  Moving that to c.h doesn't render it not junk code.  (For one
> thing, it will not operate as intended if you haven't previously
> #included <limits.h>, which in fact is not included in c.h.)

Doh.

> If we need this we should do it properly with autoconf.

My autoconf foo is not very good, but once I finish a couple of other
things I'll take a shot at doing it that way.

	Thanks!

		Stephen