Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

* David Fetter (david@fetter.org) wrote:
> That is *precisely* the business we need to be in, at least for the
> languages we ship, and it would behoove us to test languages we don't
> ship so we can warn people when they don't pass.

k, let's start with something simpler first tho- I'm sure we can pull in
the glibc regression tests and run them too.  You know, just in case
there's a bug there, somewhere.

	Thanks,

		Stephen