Re: Naming of new EXCLUDE constraints
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-04-13T17:11:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> Fine, then we will just have to live with "exclusion constraints" and > >> "contraint exclusion". > > > I am not necessarily 100% averse to changing it... just saying that it > > shouldn't be done unless we have a clear consensus to overrule the > > previous consensus. > > Well, I'm completely unimpressed with the proposed text, which includes > phrases like "uniqueness and exclude constraints". That leaves nothing > but the impression that these people don't speak the English too good. I think a simple fix would be to say "don't confuse exclusion contraints with constraint exclusion" somewhere (presumably in documentation for both features), just to raise awareness of the difference. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.