Re: [PATCH] remove redundant ownership checks

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> Disentangling that seems like a job and a half.

Indeed it will be, but I think it would be a good thing to actually have
a defined point at which permissions checking is to be done.  Trying to
read the code and figure out what permissions you need to perform
certain actions, when some of those checks are done as 'prep work' far
up the tree, isn't fun.  Makes validation of the checks we say we do in
the documentation more difficult too.  Not to mention that if we want to
allow more granular permission granting for certain operations, it gets
even uglier..

	Thanks,

		Stephen