Re: Installing PL/pgSQL by default
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Date: 2009-12-12T03:35:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > I installed PL/pgSQL by default via initdb with the attached patch. The > > only problem is that pg_dump still dumps out the language creation: > > CREATE PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE plpgsql; > > ALTER PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE plpgsql OWNER TO postgres; > > What is odd is that I used the same process that initdb uses to create > > other objects. Does anyone know why this is happening? > > I think pg_dump pays attention to what schema the objects are in, > and that's most likely creating them in PUBLIC. Try adding > "set search_path = pg_catalog". > > It's not impossible that we'll have to tweak pg_dump a bit; it's > never had to deal with languages that shouldn't be dumped ... I found that pg_dump tests for pg_language.lanispl == true, which is true for all the stored procedure languages. I can easily special case plpgsql, or check for FirstNormalObjectId, though I don't see that used in pg_dump currently. A more difficult issue is whether we should preserve the fact that plpgsql was _removed_ in the pg_dump output, i.e, if someone removes plpgsql from a database, do we issue a DROP LANGUAGE in pg_dump? I don't remember us having to deal with anything like this before. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +