Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager

Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>

From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-10T21:34:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi -

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:33:28PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> [...]
> > If the dormant overhead of these probes is measured or suspected to be
> > excessive, consider using the dtrace-generated per-probe foo_ENABLED()
> > conditional, or a postgres configuration global thusly:

> [...]  foo_enable() is good to use when number of argument and their
> evaluation cost too much. In this case it does no seem to be much
> useful. [...]

Right, I just wanted to make the others aware of the option.

> >    if (__builtin_expect(TRACE_POSTGRESQL_MCXT_ALLOC_ENABLED(), 0))
> >       TRACE_POSTGRESQL_MCXT_ALLOC(...);
> > 
> > so that the whole instrumentation parameter setup/call can be placed
> > out of the hot line with gcc -freorder-blocks.
> 
> compiler specific construct is not good way. Do not forget that also
> other compiler exists.

Certainly.  Many projects -- but apparently not postgresql -- wrap
such branch prediction hints in macros such as likely() and
unlikely(), which are easily no-op'd for compilers that don't support
this sort of thing.

- FChE