Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager
Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-10T21:34:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi - On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:33:28PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote: > [...] > > If the dormant overhead of these probes is measured or suspected to be > > excessive, consider using the dtrace-generated per-probe foo_ENABLED() > > conditional, or a postgres configuration global thusly: > [...] foo_enable() is good to use when number of argument and their > evaluation cost too much. In this case it does no seem to be much > useful. [...] Right, I just wanted to make the others aware of the option. > > if (__builtin_expect(TRACE_POSTGRESQL_MCXT_ALLOC_ENABLED(), 0)) > > TRACE_POSTGRESQL_MCXT_ALLOC(...); > > > > so that the whole instrumentation parameter setup/call can be placed > > out of the hot line with gcc -freorder-blocks. > > compiler specific construct is not good way. Do not forget that also > other compiler exists. Certainly. Many projects -- but apparently not postgresql -- wrap such branch prediction hints in macros such as likely() and unlikely(), which are easily no-op'd for compilers that don't support this sort of thing. - FChE