Horton

Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-07T06:54:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> It was written and submitted by one person who did not bother to ask
> first whether anyone else thought it was worthwhile.  So its presence
> on the CF list should not be taken as evidence that there's consensus
> for it.

Should we have "Needs Discussion" phase before "Needs Review" ?
Reviews, including me, think patches with needs-review status are
worthwhile. In contrast, contributers often register their patches
to CF without discussions just because of no response; they cannot
find whether no response is silent approval or not.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center