Re: A thought about regex versus multibyte character sets
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2009-12-01T21:46:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > I just spent a bit of time considering what we might do to fix this. > The idea mentioned in the above thread was to switch over to using > wchar_t in the regex code, but that seems to have a number of problems. > One showstopper is that on some platforms wchar_t is only 16 bits and > can't represent the full range of Unicode characters. I don't want to > fix case-folding only to break regexes for other uses. We have a TODO item about having a regex specific data type. Would implementing that solve this problem? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support