Re: Syntax for partitioning
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-10-30T20:51:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Jeff Davis (pgsql@j-davis.com) wrote: > Oid is unsigned, typmod is signed. We might be able to get away with it, > but -1 is treated specially in some places outside of the type-specific > functions, e.g. exprTypmod(). Any negative result returned from the input handling function is considered an error, as I recall. It's more than just '-1'.. > I haven't looked at all of these places yet, so maybe a few simple > changes would allow us to treat typmod as a full 32 bits. Or perhaps it > could just be expanded to a signed 64-bit int. What do you think? That was shot down previously due to the way typmods are passed around currently.. Not that it wouldn't be really nice.. Thanks, Stephen