Re: ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-10-19T15:56:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:58 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > > > Is there a good reason for $subject, other than that the code is entangled 
> > > > with other ALTER TABLE code?
> > > 
> > > I think it could be lower, but it would take nontrivial restructuring of
> > > the ALTER TABLE support.  In particular, consider what happens when you
> > > have a list of subcommands that don't all require the same lock level.
> > > I think you'd need to scan the list and find the highest required lock
> > > level before starting ...
> > 
> > IIRC there was a patch from Simon to address this issue, but it had some
> > holes which he didn't have time to close, so it sank.  Maybe this can be
> > resurrected and fixed.
> 
> I was intending to finish that patch in this release cycle.

Since you're busy with Hot Standby, any chance you could pass it on?


-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.