Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-10-15T01:38:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> My (limited) experience is that it's usually better to get something
> incremental committed, even if it's not what you really want.  You can
> always take another crack at the remaining issues later, but if the
> whole patch gets shot down then you are out of luck.

Yeah, that makes sense. But the partial change should also be
a "long-term solution" ;-). It is hard to determine whether
the partial change is a good solution until the whole features
works as expected (at least partially).

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center