Horton

Re: [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Jim Cox <shakahshakah@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Date: 2009-10-02T22:18:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Jim Cox wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> > Are we sure we don't want a date/time in the ASCII dump? ?It would
> >> > affect database diffs, but I can see it useful too.
> >>
> >> We used to have one, and it was removed by popular demand
> >> (or actually demoted to be printed only in verbose mode, IIRC).
> >> I don't feel a need to revisit that decision.
> >
> > OK, thanks, I had forgotten.
> >
> 
> To Tom's point, the patch only outputs the new info in verbose mode,
> and in that mode a timestamp is indeed already output (it is the
> subsequent line in the ASCII dump, actually).

Thank you.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +