Re: small but useful patches for text search

Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2009-03-21T16:02:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Saturday 21 March 2009 09:04:12 Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
<snip>
> My concern with the list of outstanding items for 8.4 based on a quick
> look is that I think many of those things are not, in fact,
> outstanding items for 8.4, and those that are may not be important
> enough to hold up beta for.  Now since I haven't read through them all
> yet, I'm not 100% sure of that, but that's my concern for what it's
> worth.
>

Robert,  this has been discussed many times before, and most people agree with 
you, but Bruce doesn't. I think the ony way this will change is if someone 
takes on the role of "release notes manager", subscrbes to pgsql-commits, and 
then starts updating a wiki page as each item is committed. Once other 
committers see that, I'm guessing they will start helping, and eventually 
Bruce will join in. Outside of that I think we're wasting our time on this. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com