Re: small parallel restore optimization

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-03-09T01:25:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I have found the source of the problem I saw. dumputils.c:fmtId() uses a  
> static PQExpBuffer which it initialises the first time it's called. This  
> gets clobbered by simultaneous calls by Windows threads.
>
> I could just make it auto and set it up on each call, but that could  
> result in a non-trivial memory leak ... it's probably called a great  
> many times. Or I could provide a parallel version where we pass in a  
> PQExpBuffer that we create, one per thread, and is used by anything  
> called by the parallel code. That seems like a bit of a potential  
> footgun, though.

Could you use a different static PQExpBuffer on each thread?
pthread_getspecific sort of thing, only to be used on Windows.

BTW does fmtQualifiedId have the same problem?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.