Re: small parallel restore optimization
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-03-09T01:25:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I have found the source of the problem I saw. dumputils.c:fmtId() uses a > static PQExpBuffer which it initialises the first time it's called. This > gets clobbered by simultaneous calls by Windows threads. > > I could just make it auto and set it up on each call, but that could > result in a non-trivial memory leak ... it's probably called a great > many times. Or I could provide a parallel version where we pass in a > PQExpBuffer that we create, one per thread, and is used by anything > called by the parallel code. That seems like a bit of a potential > footgun, though. Could you use a different static PQExpBuffer on each thread? pthread_getspecific sort of thing, only to be used on Windows. BTW does fmtQualifiedId have the same problem? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.