Re: pg_restore --multi-thread
David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Michael Glaesemann <michael.glaesemann@myyearbook.com>
Cc: "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>, jd@commandprompt.com, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-02-12T23:25:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:16:39PM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On 2009-02-12, at 14:15 , Jonah H. Harris wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com >> >wrote: >> >>> --num-workers or --num-connections would both work. >> >> --num-parallel? > > --num-concurrent? --num-bikeshed? ;) Cheers, David (purple!) -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate