Thread

Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

D'Arcy Cain <darcy@druid.net> — 2009-01-07T22:49:59Z

On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:38 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > So what have we decided about this suggestion.  Should I submit the
> > patch or just forget about it?  So far some people like it and some
> > people think that it is unneccessary.  No one so far has suggested that
> > it would harm the system or people's use of it.
> 
> I have gone over the discussion about this issue.  I think there is
> interest in a ReST output format, but only a 100% ReST-compliant one.  I
> don't think anyone felt they wanted a ReST-like format just for
> appearance sake.  For that reason, I have added this TODO entry:

Really?  I thought that the opposite was true, that the argument
against this change was that it was trying to be ReST.  That's why I
made a few posts arguing that while it mostly worked ReST, it was
really just a logical extension of the existing border control.

> As I remember, no actual patch was posted for this.

There was.  I am attaching it again in case there were any changes to
original files in the meantime.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.