Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl>
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>
To: James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2009-01-05T01:34:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
James Mansion wrote:
>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent me
>>>from
>>> changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?
>>copyright licenses and patents
>Would it be possible to have a plugin facility?
>I guess the most likely candidate is the LZJB mechanism in ZFS which is
>CDDL licensed.
The most likely candidate for a speedy algorithm seems QuickLZ, the author
is willing to accomodate the licensing.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.