Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl>
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-01-02T20:23:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>I think we could just add another toast storage type: alter table
>alter column set storage compress; ? It seems overkill to expose
>PGLZ_Strategy knobs per column...
Three things:
a. Shouldn't it in theory be possible to have a decompression algorithm
which is IO-bound because it decompresses faster than the disk can
supply the data? (On common current hardware).
b. Has the current algorithm been carefully benchmarked and/or optimised
and/or chosen to fit the IO-bound target as close as possible?
c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent me from
changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else."