Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5

Robert Haas escribió:

> Of course, I don't want:
> 
> - GUCs that I'm going to set, execute one statement, and the unset
> (and this likely falls into that category).
> - GUCs that are poorly designed so that it's not clear, even to an
> experienced user, what value to set.
> - GUCs that exist only to work around the inability of the database to
> figure out the appropriate value without user input.
> 
> On the flip side, rereading the thread, one major advantage of the GUC
> is that it can be used for statements other than SELECT, which
> hard-coded syntax can't.  That might be enough to make me change my
> vote.

Perhaps we'd benefit from a way to set a variable for a single query;
something like

WITH ( SET query_lock_timeout = 5s ) SELECT ...

Of course, this particular syntax doesn't work because WITH is already
taken.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.