Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres@cybertec.at>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-06-02T16:41:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
> from my side the goal of this discussion is to extract a consensus so
> that we can go ahead and implement this issue for 8.5.
> our customer here needs a solution to this problem and we have to come
> up with something which can then make it into PostgreSQL core.
> how shall we proceed with the decision finding process here?
> i am fine with a GUC and with an grammar extension - i just need a
> decision which stays unchanged.
Do we have answer for Hans-Juergen here?
I have added a vague TODO:
Consider a lock timeout parameter
* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00485.php
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +