Re: advancing snapshot's xmin
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>, "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Date: 2008-03-26T08:33:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Le mercredi 26 mars 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> whenever the number of active snapshots goes to zero
Does this ever happen?
I mean, if the way to avoid locking contention is to rely on a production
system which let the service "breathe" from time to time, maybe there's
something wrong in the reasoning.
Of course I'm much more ready to accept I don't understand the first bit of it
all than to consider you're off-tracks here, but...
--
dim
If you ask a stupid question, you may feel stupid. If you don’t ask a stupid
question, you remain stupid.
-- Tony Rothman, Ph.D.U. Chicago, Physics