Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Doug Hunley <doug@hunley.homeip.net>
From: Douglas J Hunley <doug@hunley.homeip.net>
To: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2008-02-19T20:20:33Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 15:16:42 Dave Cramer wrote: > On 19-Feb-08, at 2:35 PM, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:28:54 Dave Cramer wrote: > >> shared buffers is *way* too small as is effective cache > >> set them to 2G/6G respectively. > >> > >> Dave > > > > pardon my ignorance, but is this in the context of a restore only? > > or 'in > > general'? > > This is the "generally accepted" starting point for a pg db for > production. fair enough. I have scheduled this change for the next outage -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net "The internet has had no impact on my life whatsoever.com" - anon