Horton

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2008-01-31T13:42:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will
> > have to recognize that GUC forever.
> 
> No, because it's being used on the query side, not in the emitted dump.
> We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> error, rather than something people could override with -i.

Oh, yea, interesting, it is part of the connection.  That will help.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +