Horton

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2008-01-30T16:00:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD escribió:
> 
> > > The plural seems better to me; there's no such thing as a solitary
> > > synchronized scan, no?  The whole point of the feature is to affect
> > > the behavior of multiple scans.
> > 
> > +1. The plural is important IMHO.
> 
> ok, good.

Hmm, if you guys are going to add another GUC variable, please hurry
because we have to translate the description text.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support