Re: Proposed patch: make pg_dump --data-only consider FK constraints
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-09-07T23:33:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Gregory Stark (stark@enterprisedb.com) wrote: > The other reason to think NOTICE might be better is that it's something which, > if it occurs once, will always occur for that database. So a sysadmin will > become inured to seeing WARNING on his backups. Are there any other warning > conditions which could occur spontaneously that this would mask? Impartial on NOTICE vs. WARNING, it could go either way for me. > One minor thought -- surely the main use case for data-only dumps is for > importing into another brand of database. In which case the message seems a > bit awkward -- it could talk generically about disabling or dropping the > constraints and then have a hint to indicate how to do that with Postgres. I have to disagree strongly with this. We have multiple PG instances and often have cause to copy between them using data-only pg_dump. On the other side, I've never used pg_dump (data-only or not) to generate something to load data into a different database. Thanks, Stephen