Thread

  1. Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

    D'Arcy Cain <darcy@druid.net> — 2008-08-24T18:33:34Z

    On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:22:38 -0400
    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    > > I suppose it is my fault for mentioning ReST.  That was the reason I
    > > looked into this but that is not what the final proposal is.
    > 
    > Well, if you can't just paste your output into ReST without having to
    > hand-munge it afterwards, then ISTM the argument for having this
    > additional bit of complexity in our printing routines really falls flat.
    
    But Tom, you are still treating this as a ReST option.  Please, pretend
    that I never mentioned ReST.  Consider this simply as a proposal to
    make a logical extension to the "border [0|1|2]" setting.  If you were
    going to extend border to 3, what would you do?  Adding extra row
    dividers and turning dashes into equal signs for the existing row
    divider seems pretty logical on its own without referencing any
    external formats.
    
    -- 
    D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
    http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
    +1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.