Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Asko Oja <ascoja@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Martin Pihlak <martin.pihlak@gmail.com>
Date: 2008-08-19T18:34:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Joshua Drake wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:29:52 -0400 (EDT) > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > > Do I think it should be pushed back to 8.3.x; no. It is a feature. I > > > don't consider the existing behavior a bug. I consider it a > > > limitation and we don't back patch fixes for limitations. > > > > The bottom line here is that we don't have the time to explain or > > justify our backpatch policy every time someone shows up with a bug > > that needs to be fixed. > > Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in > developer FAQ. Seems we need to add it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +