Re: What to do with inline warnings?
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2008-05-14T21:32:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:25:10PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > The Linux kernel does have some macros meant to mark unlikely branches > (usually assertion failures) but I'm not sure how they work. And Gcc also has > a few optimizations which are driven by profiling data but I it doesn't sound > like this is one of them. There's a macro called __builtin_expect() where you can specify what the expected value of an expression is at runtime, so gcc can use this to decide which branch is more likely, or how often a loop might run. Normally you wrap it into macros like: #define likely(x) __builtin_expect(x,1) #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(x,0) So you say things like: if( likely( x==0 ) ) And gcc will optimise that the branch is likely to be taken. Using macros means that you can arrange it so that for non-gcc compilers it's a no-op. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while > boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.