Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de>
From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-11-28T23:09:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:37:04 -0500 Tom Lane wrote: > "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail@wars-nicht.de> writes: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:08:58 -0800 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Release 7.3.21 with and EOL addendum :). E.g; this is the last release > >> of 7.3 and 7.3 is now considered unsupported. > > > I know at least one customer who is using RHEL-3 and PG 7.3 on dozens > > machines worldwide. > > Are they running 7.3.20? Will they update to 7.3.21 promptly when we > ship it? Or are they using whatever Red Hat includes in RHEL-3? > (which is still 7.3.19 I believe) I'm not sure, which micro version they are using right now. I only know, they have 7.3.x, cause i already had to take care of this on some projects. > One of the reasons for losing interest in frequent updates is that > it seems most of the people we hear from who are running 7.3.x are > running a pretty obsolete "x". If we produce an update and no one > actually installs it, we're just wasting time with make-work. I said: we should not disband support of 7.3 today, release a final version next week and that's it. Something like 3, 4 month of pre-announce seems to be ok for me and i don't think, this makes much difference. Kind regards -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. (Ferenc Mantfeld)