Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2007-10-22T19:53:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:47:41 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > In fact, I could see doing a "no-catalog-changes, no major patches
> > we don't already know about, 6-month release".  It would reset our
> > cycle and get PL/proxy, DSM, clustered indexes, etc. out the
> > door.   It could mean turning away patches which look attractive,
> > though, so the whole community has to be into this.
> 
> Ah, you mean like we planned for 8.0 and failed, then for 8.1 and
> failed, then for 8.2 and failed, then for 8.3 and failed?  I can
> definitely support that idea.
> 
As I recall 8.0 and 8.1 actually went pretty well.

Joshua D. Drake

-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/