Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Warren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org>
Date: 2007-02-26T20:50:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sunday 25 February 2007 01:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Lastly, who really cares? Does it really matter? No. I would much rather
> > Warren (if he has the skills) put some effort into Patch Review.
>
> That's pretty much the bottom line. CVS is not so broken that it's a
> problem for us today. I have no doubt that it could be a problem if we
> had different usage patterns, but we don't.
It's worth keeping in mind that one of the primary reasons we don't have a
different usage pattern is because CVS makes such a thing painful. Given how
much of development is done now, I have a feeling that the community might
well adopt a distributed development model and strongly benefit from it given
a tool that makes it manageable, but CVS will certainly never give us that.
> We have the opportunity to
> wait and see what will emerge in the SCMS competition, and IMHO that's
> what we should do. There are many more-pressing things for us to spend
> time on right now than an SCMS conversion.
>
100% Agreed.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL