Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan@enterprisedb.com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-01-16T14:25:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote: > Perhaps we should focus on the issues that might result, so that we > address those before we spend time on the details of the user interface. > Can we deadlock or hang from running multiple autovacuums? If you were to run multiple autovacuum processes the way they are today, maybe. But that's not my intention -- the launcher would be the only one to read the catalogs; the workers would be started only to do a single VACUUM job. This reduces the risk of this kind of problems. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.