Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>
Date: 2007-08-30T13:30:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 15:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> What? No it doesn't. You have missed the key word in the sentence above:
> "standard". The idea is that the docs will describe the *standard*
> modules, i.e. those that ship with the PostgreSQL core distribution
> (because they are currently in contrib).
>
> If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it,
> but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for
> contrib.
That brings up additional questions such as what is standard and whose
consensus. You initially referred to Perl, and I note that Perl modules
shipped with the main Perl package ("standard"?) and those that are not
provide access to their facilities in identical ways. That's as far as I can
read your mind anyway. ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/