Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
From: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-07-03T20:13:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:19:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/routine-vacuuming.html : > > Well, with autovac defaulting to ON in 8.3, that's certainly obsolete > text now. > > Is there a reason to say anything beyond "use autovac"? There is; I know that things like web session tables aren't handled very well by autovacuum if there are any moderately large tables (anything that will take more than a few minutes to vacuum). Eventually we should be able to accommodate that case with multiple workers, but we'll need a mechanism to ensure that at least one worker doesn't get tied up in large vacuums. -- Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)