Re: ECC RAM really needed?
Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-05-26T12:43:15Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:45:15PM -0700, Craig James wrote: >We're thinking of building some new servers. We bought some a while back >that have ECC (error correcting) RAM, which is absurdly expensive compared >to the same amount of non-ECC RAM. Does anyone have any real-life data >about the error rate of non-ECC RAM, and whether it matters or not? In my >long career, I've never once had a computer that corrupted memory, or at >least I never knew if it did. ...because ECC RAM will correct single bit errors. FWIW, I've seen *a lot* of single bit errors over the years. Some systems are much better about reporting than others, but any system will have occasional errors. Also, if a stick starts to go bad you'll generally be told about with ECC memory, rather than having the system just start to flake out. Mike Stone