Re: ECC RAM really needed?
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-05-26T02:15:53Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 18:45:15 -0700, Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote: > We're thinking of building some new servers. We bought some a while back > that have ECC (error correcting) RAM, which is absurdly expensive compared > to the same amount of non-ECC RAM. Does anyone have any real-life data > about the error rate of non-ECC RAM, and whether it matters or not? In my > long career, I've never once had a computer that corrupted memory, or at > least I never knew if it did. ECC sound like a good idea, but is it > solving a non-problem? In the past when I purchased ECC ram it wasn't that much more expensive than nonECC ram. Wikipedia suggests a rule of thumb of one error per month per gigabyte, though suggests error rates vary widely. They reference a paper that should provide you with more background.